During Thursday’s session, the House of Representatives engaged in a significant deliberation as they passed a bill for a second reading, advocating for a return to the old national anthem. Julius Ihonvbere, the sponsor of the proposed law, passionately anchored his argument on the fundamental principles of patriotism and nationalism. He articulated that reverting to the old anthem would evoke a sense of unity and pride among Nigerians, fostering a deeper connection to the nation’s identity and values.

In a compelling exchange of viewpoints, Chinda, a prominent member of the Peoples Democratic Party, raised poignant concerns about the colonial legacy associated with the old anthem. He argued that in a post-independent Nigeria, it is imperative to embrace symbols and anthems that reflect the sovereignty and aspirations of the nation. This sentiment resonated strongly with Ahmad Satomi, representing Jere Federal Constituency, Borno State, who echoed Chinda’s sentiments and emphasized the need for symbols that resonate with Nigeria’s diverse cultural heritage.

However, amidst these arguments, Ahmed Jaha, another lawmaker from Borno, stood in support of the bill, offering a counter perspective. Jaha contended that the wording of the new anthem lacks substantive relevance to the pressing issues facing the Nigerian state. He argued that the old anthem, with its traditional phrasing, carries a deeper resonance with the Nigerian populace and can serve as a unifying force in turbulent times.

This spirited debate encapsulates the complexity of Nigeria’s socio-political landscape and underscores the importance of national symbols in shaping collective identity and unity. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it is poised to ignite further discourse and reflection on the nation’s rich history and aspirations for the future.

Details later….